Narrow down which types of responses you would like to see.
Narrow down the conversation to these participants:
Discussions from these authors are shown:
Political party:
@8YZCPT73yrs3Y
Yes, we can only offer, we can not force them to take help that they do not want.
@93GLTSM3yrs3Y
yes, even though they refused it, they should be limited to where they can stay. They should not be able to stay anywhere.
@3JYBQR33yrs3Y
Yes, within designated areas
@4M78YV63yrs3Y
Yes and No. Should there be a place to house the homeless? Absolutely. Do I want them occupying public spaces intended for recreation (ie. parks)? No
@49VGR683yrs3Y
Yes: it's public property. They can't be forced to leave without committing a crime.
@8Y6C6PL3yrs3Y
Should be decided on by county law
@92FLZ393yrs3Y
No, but they should add more and improved homeless shelters
@8Z68X5K3yrs3Y
Yes, but create a program to link homeless people to the utilities they need to find jobs and shelter.
@8XYNZ483yrs3Y
Yes, but as long as they do not cause any issues
@EthanHars3yrs3Y
No, force them to join military
@8XXPPWZ3yrs3Y
it really depends on whats going on and how they are acting
@925J4SK3yrs3Y
Yes, as long as they are not disturbing the peace or making a scene.
@92DRQZM3yrs3Y
It all depends on the situation, if they are good people really trying to make themselves better then by all means stay where you want. But if they are standing on the corner trying to get drug money then no.
@MSelvig3yrs3Y
This is a city specific issue and should be decided on that level. My personal stance is no.
@92QLFDP3yrs3Y
They should be able to live on the side of the road, but not in public places.
