Narrow down which types of responses you would like to see.
Show more types:
Narrow down the conversation to these participants:
Discussions from these authors are shown:
Political party:
@93GLTSM3yrs3Y
yes, even though they refused it, they should be limited to where they can stay. They should not be able to stay anywhere.
@3JYBQR33yrs3Y
Yes, within designated areas
@3VSVGRS3yrs3Y
Yes but only on public property set aside for that purpose. It should not be allowed if it is impacting the publics ability to use the property for its intended use.
@32LNXXJ3yrs3Y
No, but create more social programs to provide free food, clothing and medicine as well as better and safer shelters as current are not at all "safe" spaces, which is why many refuse to stay.
@8Y6C6PL3yrs3Y
Should be decided on by county law
@92MDVFR3yrs3Y
If they aren't creating a disturbance to others, actively engage in improving or maintaining the property, then I don't see an issue with their presence.
@92FLZ393yrs3Y
No, but they should add more and improved homeless shelters
@8Z68X5K3yrs3Y
Yes, but create a program to link homeless people to the utilities they need to find jobs and shelter.
@8XYNZ483yrs3Y
Yes, but as long as they do not cause any issues
@Ovrwatch223yrs3Y
Yes, but not public property within city limits.
@76WTH563yrs3Y
Regardless, should be decided by the state.
@7GQMXLT3yrs3Y
Individuals have a right to traverse and loiter on public property, regardless of whether they are homeless or not, so long as they are not damaging property or otherwise depriving the rest of the public of their ability to enjoy those spaces safely. Large groups of people creating "pop-up villages" within a space not designed and designated for the purpose create a hazard for those living there, deprive the rest of the general public of its use of the property, and can create an undue and unintended burden on surrounding infrastructure. I support the rights of individuals to traverse and loiter as well as the rights of local governments to protect public assets and ensure public safety.
@8XNYT2D3yrs3Y
yes, as long as it is not disturbing anyone or anything.
@8XXPPWZ3yrs3Y
it really depends on whats going on and how they are acting
@8Z4TXWG3yrs3Y
Only if there was reason for them to not want to stay the shelter
@925J4SK3yrs3Y
Yes, as long as they are not disturbing the peace or making a scene.
@92DRQZM3yrs3Y
It all depends on the situation, if they are good people really trying to make themselves better then by all means stay where you want. But if they are standing on the corner trying to get drug money then no.
@92QLFDP3yrs3Y
They should be able to live on the side of the road, but not in public places.
